Nullity of the linking matrix of a framed link

$\begingroup$

Let $L$ be a framed link of $m$ components and $(L_i,f_i)$ be the component-framing pair. The linking matrix $A=[a_{i,j}]$ where $a_{i,i}=f_i$ and $a_{i,j}=lk(L_i,L_j)$ when $i\ne j$. I have read that this matrix is a presentation matrix for the first homology group $H_1(M; \Bbb Z)$ and that the nullity of $A$ is equal to the first betti number of $M$, where $M$ is the 3-manifold obtained from $S^3$ by surgery on $L$. Can someone explain this fact to me or point me to a proof or a reference?

EDIT: I am reading Nicolaescu's Reidemeister Torsion of 3-manifolds p.77 and there I made some progress but I have some questions as well. Suppose the $c_i$ are the meridians of the solid tori we glue back on the link complement $E$ to obtain $M$. This means that we send $c_i \to f_iμ_i + λ_i$, where $μ_i, λ_i$ are the meridians and longitudes in the regular neighbourhood of $L$. It is clear to me that $μ_i$ form a basis for $H_1(E)$ and taking $K$ to be the free abelian generated by the $c_i$'s and sending them to $f_iμ_i + \sum_{k \ne i} a_{i,j}μ_k$ we have a morphism $K \to H_1(E)$ with matrix the linking matrix mentioned above. There Nicolaescu says that by taking the natural map $a:H_1(E) \to H_1(M)$ we complete the presentation as this map is onto. Here is when it's unclear to me. By $a$ I guess he means the map that sends $μ_i $ in $E$ to $μ_i $ in $M$. If this is the case then I don't understand why it's onto and while it's clear to me that the $f_iμ_i + \sum_{k \ne i} a_{i,j}μ_k$ will be in the kernel because now they bound a disk in $M$ I don't see why they should generate it.

$\endgroup$6

Reset to default

Know someone who can answer? Share a link to this question via email, Twitter, or Facebook.

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google Sign up using Facebook Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

You Might Also Like